| |
| 13 Apr 2008 16:18:47 |
| Alan Baker |
| Visual acuity... |
"At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349 inch." <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/ Introduction/visualacuity.htm > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math doesn't lie. At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. You're welcome. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
| 13 Apr 2008 09:35:40 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 9:18=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net > wrote: > "At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349 > inch." > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/ > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math > doesn't lie. > > At 460 meters =3D 500 yards =3D 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the= > human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. > > You're welcome. > Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker? You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat: the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. Especially Horvath's eye. |
| 13 Apr 2008 16:38:47 |
| Alan Baker |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
In article <1aac5890-5898-4186-966e-05b9ae77eaec@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com >, twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 9:18 am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > "At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349 > > inch." > > > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/ > > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > > > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math > > doesn't lie. > > > > At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the > > human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. > > > > You're welcome. > > > Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker? I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG, Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning .50 cal. > You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat: > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. And you're wrong. If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20 letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". > Especially Horvath's eye. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
| 13 Apr 2008 10:03:02 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 9:38=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net > wrote: > In article > <1aac5890-5898-4186-966e-05b9ae77e...@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > =A0twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 13, 9:18=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > > "At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349 > > > inch." > > > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTe= st/ > > > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > > > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but ma= th > > > doesn't lie. > > > > At 460 meters =3D 500 yards =3D 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of= the > > > human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. > > > > You're welcome. > > > Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker? > > I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG, > Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning > .50 cal. In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You're more full of shit than Horvie. Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in Nevada, lovely little thing. > > > You're not lying. =A0You really don't know you are insane. =A0I repeat: > > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. > > And you're wrong. Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have you and Horvie. Not to mention my own experience. You are insane. > > If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it > would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20 > letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bullshitter who just got exposed. Dalai Two Buddha Vail: Where Dalai never carries a weapon |
| 13 Apr 2008 17:13:14 |
| Alan Baker |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
In article <b7068acc-7c79-43d8-b62c-6bd820470e0e@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com >, twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 9:38 am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > In article > > <1aac5890-5898-4186-966e-05b9ae77e...@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > > > twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 13, 9:18 am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > > > "At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349 > > > > inch." > > > > > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest > > > > / > > > > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > > > > > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but > > > > math > > > > doesn't lie. > > > > > > At 460 meters = 500 yards = 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the > > > > human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. > > > > > > You're welcome. > > > > > Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker? > > > > I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG, > > Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning > > .50 cal. > > In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Yup. In Canada. I was in the Queen's York Rangers for most of 1979. > You're more full of shit than Horvie. > Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in > Nevada, lovely little thing. > > > > > You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat: > > > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. > > > > And you're wrong. > > Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and > graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have > you and Horvie. > Not to mention my own experience. > You are insane. You have no experience. > > > > If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it > > would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20 > > letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". > > You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bullshitter who just got > exposed. LOL Unlike you, Scottie. I have the references: <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/ Introduction/visualacuity.htm > Which you've already been given and which gives a lower limit of 5.235 inches at 500 yards. "Snellen defined ³standard vision² as the ability to recognize one of his optotypes when it subtended 5 minutes of arc. Thus the optotype can only be recognized if the person viewing it can discriminate a spatial pattern separated by a visual angle of 1 minute of arc." <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snellen_chart So a person with normal vision can discriminate objects of 1 minute of arc. "Firearms This unit is commonly found in the firearms industry and literature, particularly that concerning the accuracy of rifles. The industry tends to refer to it as minute of angle rather than minute of arc. It is popular because 1 MOA subtends approximately one inch at 100 yards, a traditional distance on target ranges. " <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute_of_arc So a minute of arc is 1" at 100 yards, which makes it 5" at 500 yards. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
| 13 Apr 2008 10:44:12 |
| Richard Henry |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 9:18=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net > wrote: > "At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349 > inch." > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/ > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but math > doesn't lie. > > At 460 meters =3D 500 yards =3D 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity of the= > human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. > > You're welcome. Normal visual acuity, maybe. Have you seen Scott's glasses? |
| 13 Apr 2008 10:45:25 |
| Richard Henry |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 10:03=A0am, twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 9:38=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > > > > > > In article > > <1aac5890-5898-4186-966e-05b9ae77e...@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > > > =A0twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 13, 9:18=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > > > "At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.00349 > > > > inch." > > > > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Penetrant= Test/ > > > > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > > > > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, but = math > > > > doesn't lie. > > > > > At 460 meters =3D 500 yards =3D 1500 feet, the normal visual acuity = of the > > > > human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. > > > > > You're welcome. > > > > Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker? > > > I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG,= > > Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning= > > .50 cal. > > In Canada? =A0BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > You're more full of shit than Horvie. > Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. =A0A2. =A0Armalite a month ago in > Nevada, lovely little thing. > > > > > > You're not lying. =A0You really don't know you are insane. =A0I repeat= : > > > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. > > > And you're wrong. > > Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and > graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have > you and Horvie. > Not to mention my own experience. > You are insane. On the other hand, you are a well-known liar. |
| 13 Apr 2008 11:28:19 |
| Richard Henry |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 10:13=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net > wrote: > In article > <b7068acc-7c79-43d8-b62c-6bd820470...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > =A0twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 13, 9:38=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > > In article > > > <1aac5890-5898-4186-966e-05b9ae77e...@q1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > =A0twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Apr 13, 9:18=A0am, Alan Baker <alangba...@telus.net> wrote: > > > > > "At 12 inches, the normal visual acuity of the human eye is 0.0034= 9 > > > > > inch." > > > > > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Penetra= ntTest > > > > > / > > > > > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > > > > > Now, I realize that I'm supposed to be a liar according to you, bu= t > > > > > math > > > > > doesn't lie. > > > > > > At 460 meters =3D 500 yards =3D 1500 feet, the normal visual acuit= y of the > > > > > human eye is (1500 * 0.00349) 5.235 inches. > > > > > > You're welcome. > > > > > Never shot a rifle in your life, have you, Baker? > > > > I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SM= G, > > > Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browni= ng > > > .50 cal. > > > In Canada? =A0BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > > Yup. In Canada. I was in the Queen's York Rangers for most of 1979. > > > You're more full of shit than Horvie. > > Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. =A0A2. =A0Armalite a month ago i= n > > Nevada, lovely little thing. > > > > > You're not lying. =A0You really don't know you are insane. =A0I repe= at: > > > > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. > > > > And you're wrong. > > > Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and > > graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have > > you and Horvie. > > Not to mention my own experience. > > You are insane. > > You have no experience. > > > > > > If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what = it > > > would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/= 20 > > > letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". > > > You are insane. =A0Horvath is merely a lying bullshitter who just got > > exposed. > > LOL > > Unlike you, Scottie. I have the references: > > <http://www.ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/PenetrantTest/ > Introduction/visualacuity.htm> > > Which you've already been given and which gives a lower limit of 5.235 > inches at 500 yards. > > "Snellen defined =B3standard vision=B2 as the ability to recognize one of > his optotypes when it subtended 5 minutes of arc. Thus the optotype can > only be recognized if the person viewing it can discriminate a spatial > pattern separated by a visual angle of 1 minute of arc." > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snellen_chart> > > So a person with normal vision can discriminate objects of 1 minute of > arc. > > "Firearms > This unit is commonly found in the firearms industry and literature, > particularly that concerning the accuracy of rifles. The industry tends > to refer to it as minute of angle rather than minute of arc. It is > popular because 1 MOA subtends approximately one inch at 100 yards, a > traditional distance on target ranges. " > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minute_of_arc> > > So a minute of arc is 1" at 100 yards, which makes it 5" at 500 yards. > Alan! Stop! Not only are you embarrassing Scott by exposing his ignorance of firearms and lack of visual acuity, you are also testing the limits of his grammar school arithmetic. |
| 13 Apr 2008 15:19:36 |
| Harry Weiner |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:03:02 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote this crap: >> >> I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG, >> Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning >> .50 cal. > >In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA >You're more full of shit than Horvie. >Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in >Nevada, lovely little thing. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Another good laugh. I was going to ask you what an M-16A1. A2 rifle was. Then I checked. http://rap4.com/paintball/os/m16a2-rifle-spyder-p-758.html I'm not talking about paintball rifles, you big fucken dumbass. If nothing else, you are quite entertaining. >> > You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat: >> > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. >> >> And you're wrong. > >Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and >graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have >you and Horvie. >Not to mention my own experience. You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. >> If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it >> would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20 >> letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". > >You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bullshitter who just got >exposed. > >Dalai Two Buddha > >Vail: Where Dalai never carries a weapon Paintball weapons. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Horvath@Horvath.net My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
| 13 Apr 2008 13:48:18 |
| klaus |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
Harry Weiner <Terd@fartingmor.com > wrote: > > You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. He already admitted why he can't hit the target. He shoots blanks! > Paintball weapons. > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari. http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already knows. He has his own collection.. Scooter has Bert. -klaus |
| 13 Apr 2008 10:06:09 |
| Dave Cartman |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
In article <ftto22$888$1@xmission.xmission.com >, klaus <klaus@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > Scooter has Bert. But Bert's clams have Scott sworn to protect them. I've been thinking about what Bert can do to protect his mustard seeds when Scott is off protecting the populace with his shoulder holster.... So far I've come up with a bubble-wrap diaper, a life sized cut-out of Scott Bert can velcro to the front of his tangerines, or maybe a Costco fire-safe modified with a 1" hole in the back, but it seems like that might get heavy to carry around. Awesome picture btw. I think we would get along really, really well, or hate each other instantly. My money is on friendship though. Dave |
| 13 Apr 2008 13:13:07 |
| Yabahoobs |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 12:48 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > Harry Weiner <T...@fartingmor.com> wrote: > > > You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > He already admitted why he can't hit the target. He shoots blanks! > > > Paintball weapons. > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last > time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to > take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari. > > http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > knows. He has his own collection.. > > Scooter has Bert. > > -klaus Wow what a concept. Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. Are you taking notes Scott ? You've had TEN YEARS to do this. |
| 13 Apr 2008 14:30:27 |
| klaus |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
Yabahoobs <chendrikson@gmail.com > wrote: > > Wow what a concept. Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. > Are you taking notes Scott ? You've had TEN YEARS to do this. Proof was posted a few years back, of Scats military experience: http://www.parrot.net/bestofbert/vietnam.html -klaus |
| 13 Apr 2008 13:38:50 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 12:19=A0pm, Harry Weiner<T...@Fartingmor.com > wrote: > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:03:02 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha > <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote this crap: > > > > >> I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG= , > >> Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Brownin= g > >> .50 cal. > > >In Canada? =A0BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > >You're more full of shit than Horvie. > >Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. =A0A2. =A0Armalite a month ago in= > >Nevada, lovely little thing. > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! =A0Another good laugh. =A0I was going to ask you what an > M-16A1. A2 rifle was. =A0Then I checked. > > http://rap4.com/paintball/os/m16a2-rifle-spyder-p-758.html > > I'm not talking about paintball rifles, you big fucken dumbass. =A0If > nothing else, you are quite entertaining. > > >> > You're not lying. =A0You really don't know you are insane. =A0I repea= t: > >> > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. > > >> And you're wrong. > > >Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and > >graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have > >you and Horvie. > >Not to mention my own experience. > > You have NO experience. =A0You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > >> If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what i= t > >> would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/2= 0 > >> letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". > > >You are insane. =A0Horvath is merely a lying bullshitter who just got > >exposed. > > >Dalai Two Buddha > > >Vail: =A0Where Dalai never carries a weapon > > Paintball weapons. > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Horv...@Horvath.net > > My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the > ultimate power in the universe." BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You pulled a bullshit lie, and your buddies back you up. BWHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hey, I've got a retired Marine Gunny who would be happy to call you a lying piece of shit freak in person. Come visit. Nine inch group at 460 with a iron sight M-16? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Dalai Two Buddha Vail: Not even there can such a group be shot |
| 13 Apr 2008 13:43:12 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 12:48=A0pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > Harry Weiner <T...@fartingmor.com> wrote: > > > You have NO experience. =A0You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > He already admitted why he can't hit the target. He shoots blanks! > > > Paintball weapons. > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last > time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to > take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari. > > http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > knows. He has his own collection.. > > Scooter has Bert. And Klaus Biggers has Horvath, Alan Baker, Yabahoobs, Dickless Dave, and Dickless Henry. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Hey, just bought a thousand rounds a couple days ago. Wonder how I afforded it. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA No surprise Biggers is so fucking stupid and ignorant he thinks Horvie actually shot a nine inch group with iron sights with an M-16. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Put it this way. A graduate of the Marine Sniper School says he couldn't do it and knows no one who could at 500 yards. Nature of the weapon and the sights. Period. One one hand, Horvath, Baker, Biggers. Peers. On the other hand, a guy who actually knows. I win. Again. As usual. Dalai Two Buddha Vail: Who needs weapons when peace is made with compassion for pathological liars who just got caught in a huge whopper. |
| 13 Apr 2008 13:44:43 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 1:06=A0pm, Dave Cartman <ver...@gmail.com > wrote: > In article <ftto22$88...@xmission.xmission.com>, > > =A0klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: > > Scooter has Bert. > > But Bert's clams have Scott sworn to protect them. =A0 > > I've been thinking about what Bert can do to protect his mustard seeds > when Scott is off protecting the populace with his shoulder holster.... > > So far I've come up with a bubble-wrap diaper, a life sized cut-out of > Scott Bert can velcro =A0to the front of his tangerines, or maybe a Costco= > fire-safe modified with a 1" hole in the back, but it seems like that > might get heavy to carry around. =A0 > > Awesome picture btw. =A0I think we would get along really, really well, or= > hate each other instantly. =A0My money is on friendship though. > Psychopaths tend to like each other. You'd get along fine. You'd hate me instantly, and I would loathe you. Now go fuck Biggers. He'd like it. |
| 13 Apr 2008 13:45:03 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 1:13=A0pm, Yabahoobs <chendrik...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 12:48 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Harry Weiner <T...@fartingmor.com> wrote: > > > > You have NO experience. =A0You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > > He already admitted why he can't hit the target. He shoots blanks! > > > > Paintball weapons. > > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > > My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last > > time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to > > take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari. > > >http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > > knows. He has his own collection.. > > > Scooter has Bert. > > > -klaus > > Wow what a concept. =A0Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. > Are you taking notes Scott ? =A0You've had TEN YEARS to do this You are insane. Get help. |
| 13 Apr 2008 13:46:32 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 1:30=A0pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > Yabahoobs <chendrik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Wow what a concept. =A0Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. > > Are you taking notes Scott ? =A0You've had TEN YEARS to do this. > > Proof was posted a few years back, of Scats military experience: I have never claimed to have any military experience, though I've got plenty with the military. Another pathetic lie from Dickless Biggers. Hey, missed you in Jackson, Dickless. You know what I think is funny? Jeff and I shook hands last summer in front a Jackson web cam, you freaks posted it.......and Yabahoobs made up some more dickless excuses for not showing up. Liars, liars, and more liars. How dickless. |
| 13 Apr 2008 20:50:26 |
| Alan Baker |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
In article <45d94a85-7ccd-45c0-ba37-79c988fa4285@k10g2000prm.googlegroups.com >, twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 12:19 pm, Harry Weiner<T...@Fartingmor.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:03:02 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha > > <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote this crap: > > > > > > > > >> I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG, > > >> Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning > > >> .50 cal. > > > > >In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > > >You're more full of shit than Horvie. > > >Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in > > >Nevada, lovely little thing. > > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Another good laugh. I was going to ask you what an > > M-16A1. A2 rifle was. Then I checked. > > > > http://rap4.com/paintball/os/m16a2-rifle-spyder-p-758.html > > > > I'm not talking about paintball rifles, you big fucken dumbass. If > > nothing else, you are quite entertaining. > > > > >> > You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat: > > >> > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. > > > > >> And you're wrong. > > > > >Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and > > >graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have > > >you and Horvie. > > >Not to mention my own experience. > > > > You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > > > >> If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it > > >> would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20 > > >> letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". > > > > >You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bullshitter who just got > > >exposed. > > > > >Dalai Two Buddha > > > > >Vail: Where Dalai never carries a weapon > > > > Paintball weapons. > > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > > > Horv...@Horvath.net > > > > My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the > > ultimate power in the universe." > > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > You pulled a bullshit lie, and your buddies back you up. > BWHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > Hey, I've got a retired Marine Gunny who would be happy to call you a > lying piece of shit freak in person. > Come visit. > Nine inch group at 460 with a iron sight M-16? > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Scottie: wrong as usual. Question: "What kind of groups is everyone getting and at what distances? Just trying to set a goal for myself here for when mine comes in. Anyone shoot at long range (500m+) with the A2's?" "1 MOA, even at 600 yards, unless I miss a wind shift (which happens a lot)." "I do think a 1-2 MOA group should be your goal. Depending upon your answers to teh above, it will either be a near term or a short term goal. The X ring is 1 MOA. The 10 ring is 2 MOA. The rifle is capable of 1 MOA or less even using oron sights." <http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=368165&page=1 For reference, "MOA" stands for minute of arc and at 460 meters / 500 yards, it's roughly equal to 5". And then there's this: "Since most assault rifles are capable of more than 1.5 MOA (to keep the math simple, let¹s say 1 MOA is 1² at 100 yards), meaning it can put a group of bullets into a 1.5² circle from 100 yards away. On a 300 yard target, this means it can hit a 4.5² circle every single time" Now, can you do the arithmetic, or must I? 500/300 * 4.5 = ??? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
| 13 Apr 2008 20:50:50 |
| Alan Baker |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
In article <45d94a85-7ccd-45c0-ba37-79c988fa4285@k10g2000prm.googlegroups.com >, twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 12:19 pm, Harry Weiner<T...@Fartingmor.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:03:02 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha > > <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote this crap: > > > > > > > > >> I've shot .22, .303, 7.62mm FN-FAL. (As well as the Canadian Forces SMG, > > >> Browning .30 machine gun (re-calibered for 7.62mm NATO) and the Browning > > >> .50 cal. > > > > >In Canada? BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > > >You're more full of shit than Horvie. > > >Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in > > >Nevada, lovely little thing. > > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Another good laugh. I was going to ask you what an > > M-16A1. A2 rifle was. Then I checked. > > > > http://rap4.com/paintball/os/m16a2-rifle-spyder-p-758.html > > > > I'm not talking about paintball rifles, you big fucken dumbass. If > > nothing else, you are quite entertaining. > > > > >> > You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat: > > >> > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. > > > > >> And you're wrong. > > > > >Geez, on one hand I have a retired Marine gunnery seargeant and > > >graduate of the Marine Sniper School, and on the other side, I have > > >you and Horvie. > > >Not to mention my own experience. > > > > You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > > > >> If you translate the height of a standard 20/20 target letter to what it > > >> would be at 500 yards, you get 26" high. Clearly, if one can see a 20/20 > > >> letter, then one can see details on it that are less than 9". > > > > >You are insane. Horvath is merely a lying bullshitter who just got > > >exposed. > > > > >Dalai Two Buddha > > > > >Vail: Where Dalai never carries a weapon > > > > Paintball weapons. > > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > > > Horv...@Horvath.net > > > > My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the > > ultimate power in the universe." > > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > You pulled a bullshit lie, and your buddies back you up. > BWHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > Hey, I've got a retired Marine Gunny who would be happy to call you a > lying piece of shit freak in person. > Come visit. > Nine inch group at 460 with a iron sight M-16? > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Scottie: wrong as usual. Question: "What kind of groups is everyone getting and at what distances? Just trying to set a goal for myself here for when mine comes in. Anyone shoot at long range (500m+) with the A2's?" "1 MOA, even at 600 yards, unless I miss a wind shift (which happens a lot)." "I do think a 1-2 MOA group should be your goal. Depending upon your answers to teh above, it will either be a near term or a short term goal. The X ring is 1 MOA. The 10 ring is 2 MOA. The rifle is capable of 1 MOA or less even using oron sights." <http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=368165&page=1 For reference, "MOA" stands for minute of arc and at 460 meters / 500 yards, it's roughly equal to 5". And then there's this: "Since most assault rifles are capable of more than 1.5 MOA (to keep the math simple, let¹s say 1 MOA is 1² at 100 yards), meaning it can put a group of bullets into a 1.5² circle from 100 yards away. On a 300 yard target, this means it can hit a 4.5² circle every single time" <http://forums.military.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/6051917042/m/1181942686/p/ 3 > Now, can you do the arithmetic, or must I? 500/300 * 4.5 = ??? -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
| 13 Apr 2008 20:53:00 |
| Alan Baker |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
In article <d47d8a33-b791-4b3a-a2c2-09641bd549b5@r9g2000prd.googlegroups.com >, twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 12:48 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: > > Harry Weiner <T...@fartingmor.com> wrote: > > > > > You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > > > He already admitted why he can't hit the target. He shoots blanks! > > > > > Paintball weapons. > > > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > > > My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last > > time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to > > take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari. > > > > http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > > knows. He has his own collection.. > > > > Scooter has Bert. > > And Klaus Biggers has Horvath, Alan Baker, Yabahoobs, Dickless Dave, > and Dickless Henry. And facts, of course. > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > Hey, just bought a thousand rounds a couple days ago. Wonder how I > afforded it. > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > No surprise Biggers is so fucking stupid and ignorant he thinks Horvie > actually shot a nine inch group with iron sights with an M-16. The facts show it's doable. Hell, they show it's not even that remarkable. > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA > Put it this way. A graduate of the Marine Sniper School says he > couldn't do it and knows no one who could at 500 yards. Nature of the > weapon and the sights. Sure. Produce a reference, Scottie... > Period. LOL > One one hand, Horvath, Baker, Biggers. Peers. Alan Baker: actually fired military arms in the armed forces. You: not so much. > On the other hand, a guy who actually knows. A guy you say exists... > I win. Again. As usual. LOL -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia "If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace from that wall to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic effect if you sit in the bottom of that cupboard." |
| 13 Apr 2008 14:56:13 |
| klaus |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: > Vail: Who needs weapons when peace is made with compassion for > pathological liars who just got caught in a huge whopper. So you are admitting you lied when you claimed to carry a weapon at places other than a shooting range or hunting except when it is unloaded. So you are saying you indeed do not *ever* carry a loaded (blanks not included in "loaded") weapon "as a service". Am I correct? Yes or no will do. But you won't answer because you have no balls and are a dickless liar. Putz. BTW: Have you seen this picture of my "mean attack dog" you are so scared of? http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/IMG_1469.JPG Putz. And how's that old rice-burner motorcycle working for you, anyway? -klaus |
| 13 Apr 2008 14:01:31 |
| Bert Hoff |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
twobuddha wrote: > On Apr 13, 1:30 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: >> Yabahoobs <chendrik...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Wow what a concept. Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. >>> Are you taking notes Scott ? You've had TEN YEARS to do this. >> Proof was posted a few years back, of Scats military experience: > > I have never claimed to have any military experience, though I've got > plenty with the military. > Another pathetic lie from Dickless Biggers. > Hey, missed you in Jackson, Dickless. > You know what I think is funny? Jeff and I shook hands last summer in > front a Jackson web cam, you freaks posted it.......and Yabahoobs made > up some more dickless excuses for not showing up. > Liars, liars, and more liars. > How dickless. I take it Robert Thompson thinks it's a forgery? Bert |
| 13 Apr 2008 15:04:50 |
| klaus |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 1:30?pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: >> Yabahoobs <chendrik...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Wow what a concept. ?Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. >> > Are you taking notes Scott ? ?You've had TEN YEARS to do this. >> >> Proof was posted a few years back, of Scats military experience: > > I have never claimed to have any military experience, though I've got > plenty with the military. I have plenty of experience with the military. I'm an army brat. My dad was an FO (That's forward observer putz) in Vietnam. Tet offensive. But you wouldn't know anything about that.... that having a father thing. But you have Bert. Putz. -klaus |
| 13 Apr 2008 14:12:44 |
| Yabahoobs |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 1:46 pm, twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 1:30 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: > > > Yabahoobs <chendrik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Wow what a concept. Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. > > > Are you taking notes Scott ? You've had TEN YEARS to do this. > > > Proof was posted a few years back, of Scats military experience: > > I have never claimed to have any military experience, though I've got > plenty with the military. > Another pathetic lie from Dickless Biggers. > Hey, missed you in Jackson, Dickless. > You know what I think is funny? Jeff and I shook hands last summer in > front a Jackson web cam, you freaks posted it.......and Yabahoobs made > up some more dickless excuses for not showing up. > Liars, liars, and more liars. > How dickless. The only "excuses" were that all of a sudden RSA got a post that said you were in Jax. You and Jeff expected everyone within a thousand miles to drop whatever they were doing and run there. That's insane...and more so : indicative of total narcissism. |
| 13 Apr 2008 14:13:37 |
| Yabahoobs |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 1:45 pm, twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 1:13 pm, Yabahoobs <chendrik...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 13, 12:48 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: > > > > Harry Weiner <T...@fartingmor.com> wrote: > > > > > You have NO experience. You know nobody from the Marine Corpse. > > > > He already admitted why he can't hit the target. He shoots blanks! > > > > > Paintball weapons. > > > > > Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! > > > > My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last > > > time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to > > > take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari. > > > >http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > > > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > > > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > > > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > > > knows. He has his own collection.. > > > > Scooter has Bert. > > > > -klaus > > > Wow what a concept. Posting a picture to offer evidence to a claim. > > Are you taking notes Scott ? You've had TEN YEARS to do this > > You are insane. Get help. Your Surrender = Noted. |
| 13 Apr 2008 14:44:46 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 1:56=A0pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Vail: =A0Who needs weapons when peace is made with compassion for > > pathological liars who just got caught in a huge whopper. > > So you are admitting you lied when you claimed to carry a weapon at > places other than a shooting range or hunting except when it is > unloaded. I did? You just made up another whopper. Outright lie. Pretty dickless of you, Biggers. > So you are saying you indeed do not *ever* carry a loaded > (blanks not included in "loaded") weapon "as a service". Am I correct? You're lying. Period. No point in enlightening you. Making up whoppers. > Yes or no will do. But you won't answer because you have no balls and > are a dickless liar. Putz. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Misses you in Jackson, dickless. As for liar, well, this post is enough. You lie like you pull your pud: often, badly, and in public. > > BTW: Have you seen this picture of my "mean attack dog" you are so > scared of?http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/IMG_1469.JPG You're the one is nutless enough to have to start talking dogs and guns....and then not have the balls to show up, Dickless Klaus. > > Putz. And how's that old rice-burner motorcycle working for you, > anyway? Had it out this morning. Get lots of compliments on it. Rice burners are for intelligent people, but given the amount of drugs you use, bet you have a Harley. Rubbie, eh? How laughable. Bet it has straight pipes. How dickless. Bet you wear chaps. How nutless. Dalai Two Buddha Vail: Where real men ride rice burners. |
| 13 Apr 2008 15:57:52 |
| klaus |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: >> >> So you are admitting you lied when you claimed to carry a weapon at >> places other than a shooting range or hunting except when it is >> unloaded. > > I did? You just made up another whopper. Outright lie. Pretty > dickless of you, Biggers. Ok, at least we got it straight. You never carry a loaded (blanks don't count) weapon. So when you said you get paid to do it or when you said you do it as a "service", that was a, we'll call it a Hillaryesque misspeaking. You don't carry a loaded weapon. And you also said you don't carry an unloaded weapon. So basically, when you said you were getting your weapon ready for your trip to Canada, you were talking about a non weapon. You know, this is all very confusing. Why don't you tell us what you meant? Putz. What exactly were you saying? It makes no sense. > >> So you are saying you indeed do not *ever* carry a loaded >> (blanks not included in "loaded") weapon "as a service". Am I correct? > > You're lying. Period. No point in enlightening you. Making up > whoppers. Help us out, oh enlightened one. Give us the secret to your speaking in tongues, Roshi. > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Misses you in Jackson, dickless. No you didn't. You snuck in and out just like you did in Park City earlier. You made sure that you wouldn;t cross paths with anyone other than your lovers > As > for liar, well, this post is enough. You lie like you pull your pud: > often, badly, and in public. And I'm sure a picture to prove that will be forthcoming... never. >> >> BTW: Have you seen this picture of my "mean attack dog" you are so >> scared of?http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/IMG_1469.JPG > > You're the one is nutless enough to have to start talking dogs and > guns....and then not have the balls to show up, Dickless Klaus. I love dogs and guns. But you started on the guns and Veitnam. have you forgotten, wet brain putz? > Had it out this morning. Get lots of compliments on it. And we'll se pictures in 3.... 2...... 1.......... Never mind. > Rice burners > are for intelligent people, Obviously, if you have one. NOT. > but given the amount of drugs you use, bet > you have a Harley. Rubbie, eh? How laughable. Bet it has straight > pipes. How dickless. Bet you wear chaps. How nutless. Nope, Nope, Nope, and nope. HTH. Putz. -klaus p.s. Putz. |
| 13 Apr 2008 19:22:14 |
| Harry Weiner |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:48:18 -0600 (MDT), klaus <klaus@xmission.xmission.com > wrote this crap: >> Paintball weapons. >> >> Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! >> > >My teenage nieces have more experience with weapons than Scooter. Last >time I took one of them to the range, we had to pare down what to >take. You can only fit so much into a Ferrari. > >http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG Geeez. Get a minivan. >It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and Those are some of my favorites. >moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than >Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. My most valuable weapon is an old percussion cap .45 muzzle loader. I was at a weapons museum in New Orleans, and I saw the same one that I had for sale. They wanted Eight Grand for it. And it didn't even have the ram rod. My next favorite is my Python. His name is, "Colt." Horvath@Horvath.net My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
| 13 Apr 2008 19:50:13 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 12:48 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > > http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > knows. He has his own collection.. I love it!!!!!!!! Never ceases to amaze me when dickless pussies post proof of being dickless pussies. If there is any truth I have ever learned about men, it is that dickless pussies by fancy cars and lots of guns so they don't feel like dickless pussies. Classic compensation for the sense of emptiness inside, a way to inflate the ego and impress other dickless pussies. Of course, real men aren't impressed by cars or assault weapons or street sweepers. They are impressed by character, integrity, honesty, ethics, and courage. Which is, of course, why Klaus Biggers impresses me about as much as his buddy Horvath impresses me. Beneath contempt. Dickless liddle wimps spewing shit on the net, trying desperately to fool people into seeing them as real men. But real men know. Reminds me of bumping into the Governator in Ketchum. Looked around as I sat down, recognized him, he made eye contact. We nodded. Real man stuff. You freaks never get it, and won't get it. When a real man walks into the room, I unconciously assess him, how he carries himself, and I recognize him. Primal behavior. When pussies walk into a room, they get assessed and ignored. You freaks get ignored. No respect. Talked to Arnie about it on the lift the next day. We got a good laugh about it: a man capable of taking care of himself gets respect and recognizes others. Unconcious stuff. Predator instinct. Why I can walk down any street I want to and not get fucked with: freaks recognize the energy. Got the same treatment from every single freak I ever met, back in the day. Fear. You would not understand. Because none of you ever get the nod from one of us. Because you think assault weapons and Ferraris make you manly. Because you do not and never will know what will make you manly. I have such compassion for you. So hard to go through life getting no respect, no recognition, being seen for what you are immediately and completely by those who are real men. Dalai Two Buddha Vail: Gave me a real big nod |
| 13 Apr 2008 19:59:13 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 2:57 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> So you are admitting you lied when you claimed to carry a weapon at > >> places other than a shooting range or hunting except when it is > >> unloaded. > > > I did? You just made up another whopper. Outright lie. Pretty > > dickless of you, Biggers. > > Ok, at least we got it straight. You never carry a loaded (blanks > don't count) weapon. Don't count on it. Amazing how you lie. Make up laughable, transparent whoppers and then fly. You belong here, freak. > So when you said you get paid to do it or when > you said you do it as a "service", that was a, we'll call it a > Hillaryesque misspeaking. Another dickless lie. You don't carry a loaded weapon. And you > also said you don't carry an unloaded weapon. So basically, when you > said you were getting your weapon ready for your trip to Canada, you > were talking about a non weapon. I have never said I was taking a weapon into Canada. Period. Another dickless, ridiculous lie. How fucking high are you, druggie? Not even making sense. Guess fucking a supermodel rots the brain, eh? > > You know, this is all very confusing. Why don't you tell us what you > meant? Putz. What exactly were you saying? It makes no sense. Makes plenty of sense. You're so fucking loaded you can't understand simple English, dipshit. > > > > >> So you are saying you indeed do not *ever* carry a loaded > >> (blanks not included in "loaded") weapon "as a service". Am I correct? > > > You're lying. Period. No point in enlightening you. Making up > > whoppers. > > Help us out, oh enlightened one. Give us the secret to your speaking > in tongues, Roshi. > Damn, I could have sworn YOU were making up some real whoppers, Biggers. Caught lying again..... > > BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Misses you in Jackson, dickless. > > No you didn't. You snuck in and out just like you did in Park City > earlier. You made sure that you wouldn;t cross paths with anyone other > than your lovers BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Holy shit, you've lost it. BTW, which former punch did I cross paths with? Made up four whoppers in one paragraph. Poor Klaus. I know you are lying. Do you? > > > As > > for liar, well, this post is enough. You lie like you pull your pud: > > often, badly, and in public. > > And I'm sure a picture to prove that will be forthcoming... never. > > > > >> BTW: Have you seen this picture of my "mean attack dog" you are so > >> scared of?http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/IMG_1469.JPG > > > You're the one is nutless enough to have to start talking dogs and > > guns....and then not have the balls to show up, Dickless Klaus. > > I love dogs and guns. But you started on the guns and Veitnam. have > you forgotten, wet brain putz? What pathetic bullshit, meth brain putz. You have threatened to show up at a meet both with guns and a dog. A real man would just show. You didn't in Jackson, with or without weapons and animals. Would have been interesting, to say the least. But then again, you know Jeff and you know me. No balls. Nutless. Freak. Biggers. > > > Had it out this morning. Get lots of compliments on it. > > And we'll se pictures in 3.... 2...... 1.......... > > Never mind. Had it out this morning. Get lots of compliments on it. And we'll see pictures of the supermodel in..... Take Jeff's word. Full dress rice burner. > > > Rice burners > > are for intelligent people, > > Obviously, if you have one. NOT. At least I'm smart enough to see you for the dickless coward and fraud you are. Smart enough for rsa, for damn sure. > > > but given the amount of drugs you use, bet > > you have a Harley. Rubbie, eh? How laughable. Bet it has straight > > pipes. How dickless. Bet you wear chaps. How nutless. > > Nope, Nope, Nope, and nope. HTH. Putz. Damn. You ain't a bike fraud? That's all right. I can always laugh at your posing around skiing. Always have, always will. From duct taped Pattagucci to bragging about a ski house, you've been a poseur ever since I met you, bitch. > > -klaus > > p.s. Putz. Shame you didn't have the balls to show up in Jackson and talk shit, coward. Freak. |
| 13 Apr 2008 20:05:25 |
| Richard Henry |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 7:50=A0pm, twobuddha <twobud...@gmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 12:48 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: > > > > >http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > > knows. He has his own collection.. > > I love it!!!!!!!! > Never ceases to amaze me when dickless pussies post proof of being > dickless pussies. > If there is any truth I have ever learned about men, it is that > dickless pussies by fancy cars and lots of guns so they don't feel > like dickless pussies. > Classic compensation for the sense of emptiness inside, a way to > inflate the ego and impress other dickless pussies. > Of course, real men aren't impressed by cars or assault weapons or > street sweepers. =A0They are impressed by character, integrity, honesty, > ethics, and courage. > Which is, of course, why Klaus Biggers impresses me about as much as > his buddy Horvath impresses me. > Beneath contempt. =A0Dickless liddle wimps spewing shit on the net, > trying desperately to fool people into seeing them as real men. > But real men know. > Reminds me of bumping into the Governator in Ketchum. =A0Looked around > as I sat down, recognized him, he made eye contact. =A0We nodded. =A0Real > man stuff. > You freaks never get it, and won't get it. > When a real man walks into the room, I unconciously assess him, how he > carries himself, and I recognize him. =A0Primal behavior. =A0When pussies > walk into a room, they get assessed and ignored. =A0You freaks get > ignored. =A0No respect. > Talked to Arnie about it on the lift the next day. =A0We got a good > laugh about it: a man capable of taking care of himself gets respect > and recognizes others. =A0Unconcious stuff. =A0Predator instinct. =A0Why I= > can walk down any street I want to and not get fucked with: freaks > recognize the energy. > Got the same treatment from every single freak I ever met, back in the > day. =A0Fear. > You would not understand. =A0Because none of you ever get the nod from > one of us. =A0Because you think assault weapons and Ferraris make you > manly. =A0Because you do not and never will know what will make you > manly. > I have such compassion for you. =A0So hard to go through life getting no > respect, no recognition, being seen for what you are immediately and > completely by those who are real men. > > Dalai Two Buddha > > Vail: =A0Gave me a real big nod Well, that was certainly convincing. |
| 13 Apr 2008 21:27:18 |
| klaus |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
twobuddha <twobuddha@gmail.com > wrote: > Of course, real men aren't impressed by cars or assault weapons or > street sweepers. They are impressed by character, integrity, honesty, > ethics, and courage. Which is exactly why everyone thinks you are a putz. -klaus p.s. Do the little pirouette for me again, would you, putz. You dance so well. |
| 13 Apr 2008 20:47:57 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 8:27=A0pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > twobuddha <twobud...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Of course, real men aren't impressed by cars or assault weapons or > > street sweepers. =A0They are impressed by character, integrity, honesty,= > > ethics, and courage. > > Which is exactly why everyone thinks you are a putz. > Thanks for showing what a complete clueless dumbfuck you are, Biggers. One thing for sure. YOU don't think I'm a putz. Because if you did, you would have shown up in Jacksonn. You're terrified of me, and you should be: you're a dickless pussy. Dumbfuck. How transparent. How fucking stupid. You've lost it, bitch. > -klaus > > p.s. =A0Do the little pirouette for me again, would you, putz. You dance > so well. Damn, could have fooled me. Posting that pic proved my point about you more clearly than a thousand words, for damn sure. What is so sad, so incredibly obvious, is that you don't have a clue about how you just showed yourself for what you are. So much for the faux Buddhist shit. I'm sure H.H. would be impressed by you trying to impress people with a shot of a bunch of dickless wimp weapons and a dickless wimp car. He probably would like the color. Dalai Two Buddha Vail: Holy shit, pinnas get some incredible dope!!!!!!! |
| 13 Apr 2008 20:48:57 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 8:05=A0pm, Richard Henry <pomer...@hotmail.com > wrote: > On Apr 13, 7:50=A0pm, twobuddha <twobud...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Apr 13, 12:48 pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com> wrote: > > > >http://www.xmission.com/~klaus/tmp/DSC_0045.JPG > > > > It was kind of a history lesson, starting with civil war rifles and > > > moving up to more modern toys. I spent more on ammo in one day than > > > Scoot makes selling shit stained pants in three years. But I need to > > > teach my nieces how to protect themselves. The nephew already > > > knows. He has his own collection.. > > > I love it!!!!!!!! > > Never ceases to amaze me when dickless pussies post proof of being > > dickless pussies. > > If there is any truth I have ever learned about men, it is that > > dickless pussies by fancy cars and lots of guns so they don't feel > > like dickless pussies. > > Classic compensation for the sense of emptiness inside, a way to > > inflate the ego and impress other dickless pussies. > > Of course, real men aren't impressed by cars or assault weapons or > > street sweepers. =A0They are impressed by character, integrity, honesty,= > > ethics, and courage. > > Which is, of course, why Klaus Biggers impresses me about as much as > > his buddy Horvath impresses me. > > Beneath contempt. =A0Dickless liddle wimps spewing shit on the net, > > trying desperately to fool people into seeing them as real men. > > But real men know. > > Reminds me of bumping into the Governator in Ketchum. =A0Looked around > > as I sat down, recognized him, he made eye contact. =A0We nodded. =A0Rea= l > > man stuff. > > You freaks never get it, and won't get it. > > When a real man walks into the room, I unconciously assess him, how he > > carries himself, and I recognize him. =A0Primal behavior. =A0When pussie= s > > walk into a room, they get assessed and ignored. =A0You freaks get > > ignored. =A0No respect. > > Talked to Arnie about it on the lift the next day. =A0We got a good > > laugh about it: a man capable of taking care of himself gets respect > > and recognizes others. =A0Unconcious stuff. =A0Predator instinct. =A0Why= I > > can walk down any street I want to and not get fucked with: freaks > > recognize the energy. > > Got the same treatment from every single freak I ever met, back in the > > day. =A0Fear. > > You would not understand. =A0Because none of you ever get the nod from > > one of us. =A0Because you think assault weapons and Ferraris make you > > manly. =A0Because you do not and never will know what will make you > > manly. > > I have such compassion for you. =A0So hard to go through life getting no= > > respect, no recognition, being seen for what you are immediately and > > completely by those who are real men. > > > Dalai Two Buddha > > > Vail: =A0Gave me a real big nod > > Well, that was certainly convincing Sure is to anyone with perception and understanding of human behavior. No surprise you didn't get it...... Dalai Two Buddha Vail: Understands human behavior, so they groom |
| 13 Apr 2008 21:55:11 |
| klaus |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote: >> >> p.s. ?Do the little pirouette for me again, would you, putz. You dance >> so well. > > Damn, could have fooled me. Posting that pic proved my point about > you more clearly than a thousand words, for damn sure. > What is so sad, so incredibly obvious, is that you don't have a clue > about how you just showed yourself for what you are. > So much for the faux Buddhist shit. I'm sure H.H. would be impressed > by you trying to impress people with a shot of a bunch of dickless > wimp weapons and a dickless wimp car. > He probably would like the color. I said piroutte, not roll over. FAIL! Try again, -klaus |
| 13 Apr 2008 22:02:51 |
| twobuddha |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Apr 13, 8:55=A0pm, klaus <kl...@xmission.xmission.com > wrote: > twobuddha <scott...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >> p.s. ?Do the little pirouette for me again, would you, putz. You dance > >> so well. > > > Damn, could have fooled me. =A0Posting that pic proved my point about > > you more clearly than a thousand words, for damn sure. > > What is so sad, so incredibly obvious, is that you don't have a clue > > about how you just showed yourself for what you are. > > So much for the faux Buddhist shit. =A0I'm sure H.H. would be impressed > > by you trying to impress people with a shot of a bunch of dickless > > wimp weapons and a dickless wimp car. > > He probably would like the color. > > I said piroutte, not roll over. FAIL! Try again, How fucked up are you? Must be some damn good dope. |
| 14 Apr 2008 03:06:32 |
| Harry Weiner |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:50:13 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha <twobuddha@gmail.com > wrote this crap: >Classic compensation for the sense of emptiness inside, a way to >inflate the ego and impress other dickless pussies. >Of course, real men aren't impressed by cars or assault weapons or >street sweepers. They are impressed by character, integrity, honesty, >ethics, and courage. And you have none of those things. You don't even know what they mean. I spit on you. Horvath@Horvath.net My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
| 14 Apr 2008 03:33:59 |
| Harry Weiner |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:38:50 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha <scottabe@hotmail.com > wrote this crap: >> >Of course, I've actually shot a M-16A1. A2. Armalite a month ago in >> >Nevada, lovely little thing. >> >> Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! Another good laugh. I was going to ask you what an >> M-16A1. A2 rifle was. Then I checked. >> >> http://rap4.com/paintball/os/m16a2-rifle-spyder-p-758.html >> >> I'm not talking about paintball rifles, you big fucken dumbass. If >> nothing else, you are quite entertaining. >> >> >> > You're not lying. You really don't know you are insane. I repeat: >> >> > the human eye cannot discern a nine inch circle at 460 yards. I can see a dollar bill at 460 meters. Can't you read the signs on the highway at 460 meters? Oh, I forgot. You don't have a car. >> Paintball weapons. >> >> Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha! >> > >Hey, I've got a retired Marine Gunny who would be happy to call you a >lying piece of shit freak in person. Caught you lying again. Caughtyoulyingagain. Caughtyoulyingagain. NO Marine would EVER say that to an officer. You should watch more, "Mail Call." I know Lee Armey could hit a watermelon at 460 meters. Horvath@Horvath.net My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the ultimate power in the universe." |
| 14 Apr 2008 10:03:46 |
| Bert Hoff |
| Re: Visual acuity... |
Harry Weiner wrote: > On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:50:13 -0700 (PDT), twobuddha > <twobuddha@gmail.com> wrote this crap: > >> Classic compensation for the sense of emptiness inside, a way to >> inflate the ego and impress other dickless pussies. >> Of course, real men aren't impressed by cars or assault weapons or >> street sweepers. They are impressed by character, integrity, honesty, >> ethics, and courage. > > And you have none of those things. You don't even know what they > mean. I spit on you. > > > Horvath@Horvath.net > > My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the > ultimate power in the universe." Hey Scott! Now you've been cursed with Gypsy spit! Bert |
