| |
| 30 Apr 2008 08:04:10 |
| Salim |
| No suspensions |
Hmmmm, the literalists last year piously claimed the league was right in suspending Amare and yet this year interpretation and intent is being used in the Boston and Atlanta series so KG and others are not suspended. A complete overreaction last year to the Indiana brawl and now commonsense reigns. This would make two asterisks for the Spurs I believe. |
| 30 Apr 2008 23:01:43 |
| Constance Reeder |
| Re: No suspensions |
On 2008-04-30, Salim <Salim@comcast.com > wrote: > Hmmmm, the literalists last year piously claimed the league was right in > suspending Amare and yet this year interpretation and intent is being used > in the Boston and Atlanta series so KG and others are not suspended. Did they violate the leave the bench rule like Stoudemire did? > A complete overreaction last year to the Indiana brawl and now > commonsense reigns. This would make two asterisks for the Spurs I > believe. The Celtics-Hawks series can give the Spurs another asterisk? Have you considered adding a couple of layers to your tinfoil hat? -- People who want to share their religious views with you almost never want you to share yours with them. -- Dave Barry |
| 01 May 2008 08:06:19 |
| Salim |
| Re: No suspensions |
"Constance Reeder" <constance@duxmail.com > wrote in message news:slrng1ig56.gd5.constance@bill.heins.net... > On 2008-04-30, Salim <Salim@comcast.com> wrote: >> Hmmmm, the literalists last year piously claimed the league was right in >> suspending Amare and yet this year interpretation and intent is being >> used >> in the Boston and Atlanta series so KG and others are not suspended. > > Did they violate the leave the bench rule like Stoudemire did? > Actual video shows they did. Ask Charlie Board. There was supposed to be no room for interpretation. >> A complete overreaction last year to the Indiana brawl and now >> commonsense reigns. This would make two asterisks for the Spurs I >> believe. > > The Celtics-Hawks series can give the Spurs another asterisk? Have > you considered adding a couple of layers to your tinfoil hat? So you are in favor of selective enforcement? |
| 01 May 2008 11:54:43 |
| Constance Reeder |
| Re: No suspensions |
On 2008-05-01, Salim <Salim@comcast.com > wrote: > > "Constance Reeder" <constance@duxmail.com> wrote in message > news:slrng1ig56.gd5.constance@bill.heins.net... >> On 2008-04-30, Salim <Salim@comcast.com> wrote: >>> Hmmmm, the literalists last year piously claimed the league was right in >>> suspending Amare and yet this year interpretation and intent is being >>> used >>> in the Boston and Atlanta series so KG and others are not suspended. >> >> Did they violate the leave the bench rule like Stoudemire did? >> > > Actual video shows they did. Ask Charlie Board. There was supposed to be > no room for interpretation. If you can point me to the video, do. You might also consider informing the media so they can write updates to their game stories.... > >>> A complete overreaction last year to the Indiana brawl and now >>> commonsense reigns. This would make two asterisks for the Spurs I >>> believe. >> >> The Celtics-Hawks series can give the Spurs another asterisk? Have >> you considered adding a couple of layers to your tinfoil hat? > > So you are in favor of selective enforcement? So you are in favor of mental health? -- Be patient. God isn't finished with me yet. -- unknown |
| 01 May 2008 16:40:18 |
| Salim |
| Re: No suspensions |
"Constance Reeder" <constance@duxmail.com > wrote in message news:slrng1jtei.aaf.constance@bill.heins.net... >> >> So you are in favor of selective enforcement? > > So you are in favor of mental health? For you, definitively. > > -- > Be patient. God isn't finished with me yet. -- unknown |