| |
| 04 May 2008 07:10:56 |
| Paul Hyett |
| CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
Record county v county partnerships : Nor 5th v Wor 181 N Boje & L Klusener Northampton War 8th v Lei 157 TR Ambrose & NM Carter Birmingham Lei 2nd v War 182 MAG Boyce & HD Ackerman Birmingham RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
| 04 May 2008 09:54:01 |
| Robert Henderson |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
In message <cZurd8d1FWHIFwhg@blueyonder.co.uk >, Paul Hyett <pah@invalid.invalid > writes >Record county v county partnerships : > >Nor 5th v Wor 181 N Boje & L Klusener Northampton >War 8th v Lei 157 TR Ambrose & NM Carter Birmingham >Lei 2nd v War 182 MAG Boyce & HD Ackerman Birmingham > >RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 Lucifer's vileness engulfs the world. RH -- Robert Henderson Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/blairscandal/ Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk |
| 04 May 2008 09:36:26 |
| Richard Dixon |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk > wrote in news:ytdceoFpmXHIFwWF@anywhere.demon.co.uk: >>RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 > > Lucifer's vileness engulfs the world. RH What's the RH optimum RPW? Richard |
| 04 May 2008 02:42:59 |
| Fred |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
On 4 May, 10:36, Richard Dixon <rdngem...@yahoo.co.uk > wrote: > Robert Henderson <phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote innews:ytdceoFpmXHIFwWF@anywhere.demon.co.uk: > > >>RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 > > > Lucifer's vileness engulfs the world. RH > > What's the RH optimum RPW? > > Richard Dunno what RH reckons, but I'd have thought that something aroud 30 would be a decent balance between bat and ball. A week where the average wicket is going at more than 40 makes it sound far too easy for the batsman. I like watching a stylish batsman dominate, but I also like watching bowling attacks who scent a wicket with almost every ball. Variety is the spice of life, and a RPW of 40 doesn't sound like variety... |
| 04 May 2008 10:32:42 |
| Paul Hyett |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
On Sun, 4 May 2008 at 09:36:26, Richard Dixon <rdngemail@yahoo.co.uk > wrote in uk.sport.cricket : >Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in >news:ytdceoFpmXHIFwWF@anywhere.demon.co.uk: > >>>RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 >> >> Lucifer's vileness engulfs the world. RH > >What's the RH optimum RPW? I'd have guessed, since he often refers to the 1950's as a 'golden age', at around 25RPW. -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
| 04 May 2008 11:34:03 |
| Robert Henderson |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
In message <Xns9A946BEE18B49rdngemailyahoocouk@62.253.170.163 >, Richard Dixon <rdngemail@yahoo.co.uk > writes >Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in >news:ytdceoFpmXHIFwWF@anywhere.demon.co.uk: > >>>RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 >> >> Lucifer's vileness engulfs the world. RH > >What's the RH optimum RPW? > >Richard 25 pw RH -- Robert Henderson Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/blairscandal/ Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk |
| 05 May 2008 05:50:08 |
| Robert Henderson |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
In message <oGgW6zeMCZHIFw2L@blueyonder.co.uk >, Paul Hyett <pah@invalid.invalid > writes >On Sun, 4 May 2008 at 09:36:26, Richard Dixon <rdngemail@yahoo.co.uk> >wrote in uk.sport.cricket : > >>Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in >>news:ytdceoFpmXHIFwWF@anywhere.demon.co.uk: >> >>>>RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 >>> >>> Lucifer's vileness engulfs the world. RH >> >>What's the RH optimum RPW? > >I'd have guessed, since he often refers to the 1950's as a 'golden >age', at around 25RPW. Well, I would settle for that, although I sometimes hanker after the averages of the 1870s. RH -- Robert Henderson Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/blairscandal/ Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk |
| 05 May 2008 17:18:03 |
| Paul Hyett |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
On Mon, 5 May 2008 at 05:50:08, Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk > wrote in uk.sport.cricket : >In message <oGgW6zeMCZHIFw2L@blueyonder.co.uk>, Paul Hyett ><pah@invalid.invalid> writes >>On Sun, 4 May 2008 at 09:36:26, Richard Dixon <rdngemail@yahoo.co.uk> >>wrote in uk.sport.cricket : >> >>>Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in >>>news:ytdceoFpmXHIFwWF@anywhere.demon.co.uk: >>> >>>>>RPW : Week 40.95, YTD 34.20 >>>> >>>> Lucifer's vileness engulfs the world. RH >>> >>>What's the RH optimum RPW? >> >>I'd have guessed, since he often refers to the 1950's as a 'golden >>age', at around 25RPW. > > >Well, I would settle for that, although I sometimes hanker after the >averages of the 1870s. RH WG's perhaps? :) Getting back closer to the point, why is it you prefer the game to be more favourable to bowlers, than batsmen? -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
| 05 May 2008 19:29:03 |
| Robert Henderson |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
In message <6JLiJxIiwzHIFwVq@blueyonder.co.uk >, Paul Hyett <pah@invalid.invalid > writes >>> >>>I'd have guessed, since he often refers to the 1950's as a 'golden >>>age', at around 25RPW. >> >> >>Well, I would settle for that, although I sometimes hanker after the >>averages of the 1870s. RH > >WG's perhaps? :) > >Getting back closer to the point, why is it you prefer the game to be >more favourable to bowlers, than batsmen? >-- Because bowlers represent the forces of righteousness. RH -- Robert Henderson Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/blairscandal/ Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk |
| 06 May 2008 06:41:47 |
| Paul Hyett |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
On Mon, 5 May 2008 at 19:29:03, Robert Henderson <philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk > wrote in uk.sport.cricket : >> >>Getting back closer to the point, why is it you prefer the game to be >>more favourable to bowlers, than batsmen? > >Because bowlers represent the forces of righteousness. RH And now the real reason? -- Paul Hyett, Cheltenham |
| 06 May 2008 14:12:29 |
| Robert Henderson |
| Re: CC Stats 2008 - Week 3 (You won't like this, Robert!) |
In message <fFTrKXLCs$HIFwRR@blueyonder.co.uk >, Paul Hyett <pah@invalid.invalid > writes >On Mon, 5 May 2008 at 19:29:03, Robert Henderson ><philip@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in uk.sport.cricket : >>> >>>Getting back closer to the point, why is it you prefer the game to be >>>more favourable to bowlers, than batsmen? >> >>Because bowlers represent the forces of righteousness. RH > >And now the real reason? REPENT OF THY BLASPHEMY!!!!!!!!!!!! RH -- Robert Henderson Blair Scandal website: http://www.geocities.com/blairscandal/ Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk |